Old People Have a Duty to Crawl Away and Die

Share

And so we come full circle.  I am very angry about this whole idea of hiding socialized medicine within the pages of the Stimulus Bill.  I find it beautifully ironic that the same people who are leading the charge against socialized medicine are the very ones who have embraced the false agenda of immigration reform proposed by John Tanton and Richard Lamm as a form of population control, not security.

“…The Pioneer Fund liked what it saw and, between 1985 and 1994, disbursed about $1.2 million to FAIR. In 1997, when the Phoenix New Times confronted Tanton about the matter, he “claimed ignorance about the Pioneer Fund’s connection to numerous researchers seemingly intent on proving the inferiority of blacks, as well as its unsavory ties to Nazism.” But he sounded a different tune in 2001, when he insisted that he was “comfortable being in the company of other Pioneer Fund grantees.” Today, Tanton’s defense is that he is no different than the “open borders crowd” that accepts money from the liberal Ford Foundation, which was founded by Henry Ford, the anti-Semitic auto manufacturer. What he ignores is that the Ford Foundation, unlike the Pioneer Fund, is not promoting racist ideas….In the 1980s, a notorious eugenicist outfit known as the Pioneer Fund — a foundation focused on race, intelligence and genetics and described by the London Sunday Telegraph as a “neo-Nazi organization closely integrated with the far right in American politics” — began to get some very bad publicity. When it was reported in 1988 that FAIR had received substantial Pioneer funding, Tanton claimed he had no idea what the fund’s background was. But FAIR continued to take its cash….”

Socialized Medicine is the left’s version of hard-core Immigration Reform.  The leaders of both movements have several things in common.  They include John Tanton, Richard Lamm, hard-core enviromental activists, who are not only just that, but also Planned Parenthood, etc.

The SPLC recently reported:

“…FAIR, CIS and NumbersUSA are all part of a network of restrictionist organizations conceived and created by John Tanton, the “puppeteer” of the nativist movement and a man with deep racist roots. As the first article in this report shows, Tanton has for decades been at the heart of the white nationalist scene. He has met with leading white supremacists, promoted anti-Semitic ideas, and associated closely with the leaders of a eugenicist foundation once described by a leading newspaper as a “neo-Nazi organization.” He has made a series of racist statements about Latinos and worried that they were outbreeding whites. At one point, he wrote candidly that to maintain American culture, “a European-American majority” is required.

FAIR, which Tanton founded and where he remains on the board, has been listed as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Among the reasons are its acceptance of $1.2 million from the Pioneer Fund, a group founded to promote the genes of white colonials that funds studies of race, intelligence and genetics. FAIR has also hired as key officials men who also joined white supremacist groups. It has board members who regularly write for hate publications. It promotes racist conspiracy theories about Latinos. And it has produced television programming featuring white nationalists.

CIS was conceived by Tanton and began life as a program of FAIR. CIS presents itself as a scholarly think tank that produces serious immigration studies meant to serve “the broad national interest.” But the reality is that CIS has never found any aspect of immigration that it liked, and it has frequently manipulated data to achieve the results it seeks. Its executive director last fall posted an item on the conservative National Review Online website about Washington Mutual, a bank that had earlier issued a press release about its inclusion on a list of “Business Diversity Elites” compiled by Hispanic Business magazine. Over a copy of the bank’s press release, the CIS leader posted a headline — “Cause and Effect?” — that suggested a link between the bank’s opening its ranks to Latinos and its subsequent collapse.

Like CIS, NumbersUSA bills itself as an organization that operates on its own and rejects racism completely. In fact, NumbersUSA was for the first five years of its existence a program of U.S. Inc., a foundation run by Tanton to fund numerous nativist groups, and its leader was an employee of that foundation for a decade. He helped edit Tanton’s racist journal, The Social Contract, and was personally introduced by Tanton to a leader of the Pioneer Fund. He also edited a book by Tanton and another Tanton employee that was banned by the Canadian border officials as hate literature, and on one occasion spoke to the Council of Conservative Citizens, a hate group which has called blacks “a retrograde species of humanity.”

Together, FAIR, CIS and NumbersUSA form the core of the nativist lobby in America. In 2007, they were key players in derailing bipartisan, comprehensive immigration reform that had been expected by many observers to pass. Today, these organizations are frequently treated as if they were legitimate, mainstream commentators on immigration. But the truth is that they were all conceived and birthed by a man who sees America under threat by non-white immigrants. And they have never strayed far from their roots….”

One of the reasons The One (anointed) is trying to ram this vile stimulous bill through the House and Senate so quickly is because he and his nasty little minions of meyhem and merriment are planning to take over and completely socialize medicine.

What is the logic of taking the most modern medical system the world has ever known and turn it into a sham resembling what is going on in the UK, where people are so hard-pressed to find a dentist that they are doing their own dental surgery.  They are preforming their own operations. They are dying at remarkable rates.

This is terrifying.  One of the few lessons The One (anointed) has learned from history is what happened with Bill Clinton tried to socialize medicine.  The Clintons were up front with their plans.  Obama – well he and his minions are outright lying about what they are doing.

There is a beautiful irony here.  One of the advocates for basically demanding the elderly die is former Colorado governor Richard Lamm.

“…In 1984, his outspoken statements in support of physician-assisted suicide generated some controversy, specifically over his use of the phrase “we have a duty to die.” Lamm later explained that he “was essentially raising a general statement about the human condition, not beating up on the elderly,” and that the exact phrasing in the speech was “We’ve got a duty to die and get out of the way with all of our machines and artificial hearts and everything else like that and let the other society, our kids, build a reasonable life.” [1] His dire predictions for the future of social security and health care (“duty to die“) earned him the nickname “Governor Gloom”….”

There is one reason Democrats, liberal Democrats, want to limit health care.  They want people to die.  They advocate abortion on demand.  Lamm helped come up with the idea that the elderly needed to die to make room for the young.

It is all about out of control “Green” hell and population control through forced abortion, eugenics, and the limitation of immigration. I’ve been warning you for several  years what these people were up to.  Now we come full circle. Lamm is a close friend and collegue of John Tanton.  He is a rank racist who dislikes Hispanics, African Americans and Jews.

“…After leaving office, Lamm has continued to speak publicly on environmental, immigration reduction, and health care issues. He has said he left the Democratic Party because of what he believed to be its demagoguery on the Medicare issue during the budget debate of 1995-96 and because of the tight rein special interest groups, especially trial lawyers, had on the party. When asked why he didn’t become a Republican, he said special interests, such as the Christian Coalition, also control the GOP. In 1996 he unsuccessfully challenged Ross Perot for the nomination of the Reform Party for the U.S. Presidency. In 2004 he unsuccessfully ran for a seat on the Board of Directors of the Sierra Club. He serves as the Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), and on the Board of Directors of the Diversity Alliance for a Sustainable America (DASA). He is currently the Co-Director of the Institute for Public Policy Studies at the University of Denver. He is also a Certified Public Accountant. He authored a book, The Brave New World of Health Care, a criticism of current United States health care policies and proposals for reforming them…”

It is all about population control, the coming race war, and the duty to die.

“…That was the least of it. In a 1992 interview with Omni magazine, Hardin said he supported abortion — “A fetus is of so little value, there’s no point worrying about it” — as “effective population control.” He argued the Third World is filled with “the next generation of breeders” who need to be stopped. He discouraged aid to starving Africans because that would only “encourage population growth.” Hardin wasn’t alone. A current FAIR advisory board member, three-time Democratic governor of Colorado Richard Lamm, sounded a similar theme in 1984, while still governor, saying “terminally ill people have a duty to die and get out of the way.”

Like Tanton, Lamm seems to fear a coming race war. In his futuristic 1985 novel, Megatraumas: America at the Year 2000, Lamm sketches it out like this: “[O]ur lack of control of our borders allowed 2 million legal and illegal immigrants to settle in the United States every year. That caused unemployment to rise to 15.2 percent by 1990 and 19.1 percent this year. … [T]he rash of firebombings throughout the Southwest, and the three-month siege of downtown San Diego in 1998 were all led by second-generation Hispanics, the children of immigrants.”

As late as 2004, Lamm was sounding similar racial fears, telling a reporter that “new cultures” in the U.S. “are diluting what we are and who we are.”…”

I have a feeling if The One (anointed) is going to pattern his socialized medicine after the UK, those who can afford to pay for decent medical care will be able to get it. If so, this is all about eleminating, through lack of medical care, the poor, who include a disporportinate number of Hispanic immigrants and African Americans.

African Americans have the highest number of abortions. They are literally killing off their race. Obama must know this.  Hispanic immigrants can’t afford their own health care.  It is all about population control in order to save the planet. If humans must suffer and die, so be it.

“…The stimulus bill does that, and calls it the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research (190-192). The goal, Daschle’s book explained, is to slow the development and use of new medications and technologies because they are driving up costs. He praises Europeans for being more willing to accept “hopeless diagnoses” and “forgo experimental treatments,” and he chastises Americans for expecting too much from the health-care system.

Elderly Hardest Hit

Daschle says health-care reform “will not be pain free.” Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them. That means the elderly will bear the brunt.

Medicare now pays for treatments deemed safe and effective. The stimulus bill would change that and apply a cost- effectiveness standard set by the Federal Council (464).

The Federal Council is modeled after a U.K. board discussed in Daschle’s book. This board approves or rejects treatments using a formula that divides the cost of the treatment by the number of years the patient is likely to benefit. Treatments for younger patients are more often approved than treatments for diseases that affect the elderly, such as osteoporosis.

In 2006, a U.K. health board decreed that elderly patients with macular degeneration had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they could get a costly new drug to save the other eye. It took almost three years of public protests before the board reversed its decision….”

Share