The “Ethics” of Population Control & Eugenics


When ruling elites force abortion, end of life termination, and the wholesale elimination of people who are not “feasible” these things become known as crimes against humanity.  Those who enforce it have been known to be tried for those crimes and executed.

What about the Democrats in the US House of Representatives and the Obama Administration?  Will their actions be considered “crimes against humanity” or will they get an ‘atta boy’ pack on their backs for killing off the remainder of the Greatest Generation.

Will they get a break because they are going to start killing off those of us who are Baby Boomers?  Have you noticed how liberals are already starting to talk about Baby Boomers and how we are nothing but a generation of consumers?  They are also starting to condemn an entire generation because we are going to cost so much as we grow old.  Is Health Care Reform specifically aimed at us?  Are we Baby Boomers going to be targeted for extermination?

I find myself asking the same question.  We’re dealing with a group of men and women who don’t seem to care if they pass a law that will doom millions of Americans to pain, suffering, misery and an early death.

What is truly daunting is the fact that in a few years, these people are going to want to kill me.  It’s one thing to talk about others, but when it comes down to you – golly.

They’re going to steal all my plans.  They’re taking my hopes and my dreams.

This is the United States of America.  Things like this are not to happen here – but they are.  And is anyone really fighting it?  Are they?

Why isn’t the media out in force, exposing an agenda of death that is comparable to the Nazis.  That’s what we’re talking about, a Nazi culture of death, promoted by Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid.

Do these people sleep at night?

Do they have souls?

These people are going to kill us, especially those of us with an “R” by the end of their names.

Have you seen the extra money allocated for ACORN?  Why?

Are you as angry as I am at friends and family members who voted for Obama and the Democrats?  I want to get in their faces and scream “Murderer”.  I know some of these people are anti-abortion, but they still voted for people who are going to legally kill anyone over the age of 65.  And – they don’t give a damn.  They don’t believe it.  They are living in this rose colored Obama la-la world, their eyes covered by the scales of damnation and evil.

That’s what this is – pure, unadulterated evil.

Are people who voted for these people going to be held accountable?  Are the people who created this going to be held accountable for their demonic deeds?

God help us all – literally.

Tonight my 85 year old father said here he fought in World War II against the Nazis and the concentration camps, and those who would decide who would live and die.  Now it has come to our country.  He wants to know what good it was, fighting for a country that is going to turn into what he was fighting against.

I know this sounds fanatical, but evil is evil is evil.  What Barack Obama and his minions are doing is pure, unadulterated evil – absolute evil.  If liberals were honest they would recognize crimes against humanity and hate crimes and stop them before they occur.  But – it will be years after those who oppose Obama are statistics of death that someone will get the bright idea that what he did and promoted was no different than any other despot.


Money relieves pain.  Anyone want to take a guess what Obama and his Dems would do with that one?  Will they attempt to relieve us of all our money and give it to others to relieve their pain?

Is Health Care Reform about socialism, government take-over, abject fascism, or population control.  Is it about Obama and his Democrats ruling every part of our lives?  Phil Gingray (GA) introduced an amendment to the “bill” that would require bureaucrats will not dictated to doctors as to how they must treat patients.  The Democrats defeated it.

“…In section 931 of the Public Health Service Act, as  added by section 2401,…Nothing in this section  shall, be construed to allow any federal employee or political appointee to dictate how a medical provider practices medicine….”

There are unintended consequences to many actions.  China is now starting to pay the price for hard core population control to the point where now they want to lift the “one child” policy in Shanghai.  What is going to happen in another generation when the men and boys in China can’t find wives and there are no children?

Are we going to be looking at another version of the Rape of the Sabine Women?

One other consequence is China is spawning a nation of unattached males.  They have no cousins, other than males.  There are no siblings, very few aunts, a few uncles, and parents and grandparents who are dying without any sort of cultural support.

Michelle Malkin wrote of Harrison Brown, of the International Eugenics Society:

“…Brown exhorted readers to accept that “we must reconcile ourselves to the fact that artifical means must be applied to limit birth rates.” If we don’t, Brown warned, we faced a planet “with a writhing mass of human beings.” He likened the global population to a “pulsating mass of maggots.”…”

These are the unintended consequences of extreme social control that runs contrary to not only “God’s” law but basic laws of human nature. We have a POTUS who has a wife who basically invented “patient dumping” as a way to legally terminate the indigent elderly.

“Page 425 of the Health care bill states that everyone on Social Security (including all Senior citizens and SSI recipients will be required to go to MANDATORY counseling every 5 years to learn and to choose from waysto end your suffering (and your life).  Health care will be  denied based on age. 500 billion will be cut from Senior’s healthcare.  The only way for that to happen is to drastically cut health care from the oldest and sickest and they will be cut  first.  Paying for your own health care will not be an option.”

It is about population control.  Evidently the Americans are not dying at a fast enough rate.  For 2006 the leading causes of death in the US were:

Heart disease: 631,636
Cancer: 559,888
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 137,119
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 124,583
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 121,599
Diabetes: 72,449
Alzheimer’s disease: 72,432
Influenza and Pneumonia: 56,326
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 45,344
Septicemia: 34,234

When  you finally stop and look at these numbers, they aren’t as large as are claimed.  Think about the numbers – and the population of the US.  We’re talking no more than a half a million or so deaths from cancer and from heart disease.  There’s less than a hundred thousand deaths a year form diabetes.  If you want to control the population and “cull” the herd, we’re not dying fast enough.

Dr. Bill Smith of the ARRA News Service writes:

“…Legally forcing senior citizens to have “death with dignity schedules every few years is just another way to say the government wants to make sure seniors know it is time to commit suicide to save the system money. And saving any medical system through encouraged deaths of the elderly or unborn is not a medical system worth having. The Hippocratic Oath requires doctors to “do no harm.” That’s meant toward the patient, not the costs to the government. Ref: H.R.America’s Affordable Choices Act of 2009…”

More from Flopping Aces.   Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, has a brother who is vying to become the US version of Joseph Mengele.   Flopping Aces links to a commentary by Betsy McCaughey in the NY Post.

“…Yes, that’s what patients want their doctors to do. But Emanuel wants doctors to look beyond the needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.

Many doctors are horrified by this notion; they’ll tell you that a doctor’s job is to achieve social justice one patient at a time.

Emanuel, however, believes that “communitarianism” should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those “who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia” (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. ’96).

Translation: Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy.

He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: “Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years” (Lancet, Jan. 31)….No one has leveled with the public about these dangerous views. Nor have most people heard about the arm-twisting, Chicago-style tactics being used to force support. In a Nov. 16, 2008, Health Care Watch column, Emanuel explained how business should be done: “Every favor to a constituency should be linked to support for the health-care reform agenda. If the automakers want a bailout, then they and their suppliers have to agree to support and lobby for the administration’s health-reform effort.”…”


4 thoughts on “The “Ethics” of Population Control & Eugenics

  1. Boy, are you overreacting. No one is proposing that people age 65 and older be killed.

    Please think of ways you can work with others in your community and the government to bring solutions to deal with today’s significant economic and social problems.

    These right wing hysterics and hate mongering don’t get anyone anywhere.

Comments are closed.