“…A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate; sodomizing the child is OK. If a man penetrates and damages the child, then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister. . . It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house rather than her father’s house. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven….”Ayatollah Khomeini
Muslims by the thousands are organizing to converge on Washington later this month to pray for the soul of America.
Michael Medved brought up a very good point awhile back. You never see Christians or Jews killing people because is Torah or Bible is trashed. In this country a kid can’t even criticize an Islamic student for dissing a flag.
You also don’t see Christians and Jews celebrating the life of a pedophile or forcing little girls to marry grown men.
Why is the Koran better than the Torah or the Bible? Why is Islam better than any other culture? Name Islamic Nobel Prize Winners – please. They are barbaric, for want of a better term. Why are their self-righteous wishes more important than ours?
Robert Spencer has an excellent Front Page Mag commentary about the rights of Islam to destroy Christians or Jews but we have no rights. He also blames much of this on liberals!
Evidently, even in the US, it is okay to threaten to kill your teenage daughter who converts to Christianity, if you are Islamic.
Why must the wishes of radical Islam be tollerated by everyone, but they cannot be tollerant of our culture?
From American Thinker:
“…The beginning phase of Islamization usually includes activities pivotal to building a physical presence. It consists of public calls to prayer; founding of schools, libraries and research centers; and the teaching of Arabic — actions that appear to be reasonable and respectable infrastructure requirements necessary to support the presence of a faith. At this point in the Hijra, it is permissible for Muslims to engage in haram, or forbidden actions, out of necessity to establish and empower the umma or Muslim community. Koranic rules such as the prohibition against friendships with infidels are suspended while the objectives of future Islamization are systematically put into place. In its initial phase, the Hijra passes scrutiny by the West whose citizens erroneously view the migration as mainly economic — a pilgrimage for a better life….”