Site Meter
Share

There is something very frightening about a segment of society when they begin to see men and women of thought – intellectuals – as the enemy.  There is this strange and mythical battle of the “elites” verses “country” people.  It is just plain weird, considering that the so called “country” people are the ones who have taken respect for our Founding Fathers into a religion.

It is truly odd because men like Jefferson, Adams, and Franklin were towering intellectuals – men of thought, logic, and reason.  The great irony is Michael Medved is the type of intellectual they would embrace, while eschewing the likes of Limbaugh, Ingraham, Hannity, and their ilk.  In fact, the 1776 version of the far right talking heads – Thomas Paine – was shunned by the Founders.  He was immensely disliked because of his lack of intellect (among other things).

Michael Medved is probably the most reasonable and logical conservative talk show host on the radio today.  He is rational. He makes sense.  He does not give in to the slings and arrows of gloom and doom.  I also like the fact that he thinks through things and is unwilling to wax hysterical over Obama.

The Pink Flamingo sees something else in his commentary.  Medved has spent the past two years trying to maintain an equilibrium of rational behavior.  While others are running around, screaming and shouting, waiting for the sky to fall, Medved is the voice of reason.  Consequently, when Peter Wilson attempts to rationalize the sky is falling agenda at American Thinker, the usual suspects come out to damn Medved the way they do anyone who tries to rise above the stupidity and end is near drama of the far right.

It is amazing how the nasties attack him for saying something of which they disagree.  Naturally, we soon discover that Glenn Beck is the font of all knowledge and Medved is intellectual liberal.  This bunch truly detests anyone who is “intellectual”, primarily because Rush Limbaugh is now slamming intellectuals.

American Thinker

Do you know what the definition of “intellectual” is?

An intellectual is a person who uses intelligence (thought and reason) and critical or analytical reasoning in either a professional or a personal capacity.

In  WSJ Medved wrote:

“…Some conservative commentators may feel inclined to spend Presidents Day ruminating over Barack Obama’s evil intentions, or denouncing the chief executive as an alien interloper and ideologue perversely determined to damage the republic. Instead, they should consider the history of John Adams’s White House prayer and develop a more effective focus for their criticism.

On Nov. 2, 1800, a day after he became the first president to occupy the newly constructed executive mansion, Adams wrote to his wife Abigail: “I pray Heaven to bestow the best of blessings on this house and all that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise men ever rule under this roof.”…

…In terms of wisdom, some of Adams’s successors who “ruled” under the White House roof most certainly fell short. James Buchanan comes to mind—or Jimmy Carter….On his radio show last July 2, the most influential conservative commentator of them all reaffirmed his frequent charge that the president seeks economic suffering “on purpose.” Rush Limbaugh explained: “I think we face something we’ve never faced before in the country—and that is, we’re now governed by people who do not like the country.” In his view, this hostility to the United States relates to a grudge connected to Mr. Obama’s black identity. “There’s no question that payback is what this administration is all about, presiding over the decline of the United States of America, and doing so happily.”

Regardless of the questionable pop psychology of this analysis, as a political strategy it qualifies as almost perfectly imbecilic. Republicans already face a formidable challenge in convincing a closely divided electorate that the president pursues wrong-headed policies. They will never succeed in arguing that those initiatives have been cunningly and purposefully designed to wound the republic. In Mr. Obama’s case, it’s particularly unhelpful to focus on alleged bad intentions and rotten character when every survey shows more favorable views of his personality than his policies….”

And so Michael Medved is guilty of the unpardonable sin.  He does not think Barack Obama is a commie plant.  He thinks Birthers are loony.  He believes hard-line anti-immigration reformers are going to destroy any outreach to the Hispanic community and doom the GOP.  Neither does he think Obama is deliberately trying to destroy the country.

Neither does The Pink Flamingo.  I see Barack Obama as an empty suit.  Perhaps the anti-intellectuals are wiser than I, more worldly.  Then again, The Pink Flamingo realizes that the candidates supported by the anti-intellectual bunch – Rand Paul and the likes of Christine O’Donnell are nothing but empty suits, also.

As disconcerting this stream of anti-intellectualism is, even more alarming is the distinct strain of Antisemitism  that flows through the comments at American Thinker.  Evidently, because Michael Medved is Jewish, he is not quite a real conservative.

“...Keep in mind that Medved is Jewish, and he has a brother who lives in Israel. At some point I expect Medved to make a right turn.  He is a very bright guy, with an impressive recall of facts, but his views must drive his friends in Israel crazy…”

The very real problem is that there is a serious Antisemitic strain within the anti-intellectual “country” people.  I find it very very.

Share

4 Comments

  • Sanity102 says:

    This made me smile because Medved’s entire slant is disagreeing calls. People love to try and beat him but the man’s ability to debate is beyond question. Some of my most memorable talk show moments involve conversations he’s had with people. Michael asked one Black woman…”So, you were raised in a home your parents owned, among a middle class lifestyle bought by the money your dad made from his contract business, attended a state university, and now make a good living…so tell me how slavery to some ancestor generations ago hurt YOU personally and why we, whose ancestors never owned a slave should give YOU monetary compensation?

    The man WAS a liberal until, like most of us, he GREW up. Then he flirted with Losertarianism before becoming one of the sane.

    By the way…Losertarian is Medved’s word as well as “focus like a laser beam”.

  • SallyVee says:

    Thanks for this. Some of the trash that was written about Medved yesterday, in response to his rather mild suggestion, was shocking. And the reactions of course did nothing but add proof to Medved’s contentions. Here is a comment about Medved made at Lucianne.com, on the day after site manager Joshua Goldberg died, no less:

    Reply 29 – Posted by: coldoc, 2/14/2011 10:24:05 AM (No. 7360679)

    Maybe its an aberration of the jewish brain. They watched their brothers and sisters being rounded up and put on railroad cars for moths, and yet never fought back, firm in the belief that it was other than what it really was. They seem to be the same with democrats who time and again prove to be enemies of the state of Israel, and lately with Obowma. Denial, denial, denial. How can a smart guy like medved be so blind. It has to be genetic. [END QUOTE]

    I also noticed there was very little if any discussion at all about John Adams’ prayer — the basis of the column.

  • SJ Reidhead says:

    It is about the lack of civility. Then again Rush says civility is the new form of censorship!

    SJR

  • Sanity102 says:

    Oh you should have seen him when the illegal immigration issue was hot; he was the only major talk show host that cautioned that that issue would cost the GOP Congress in 2006, but no one cared.

    Hey a really cool thing happened on Dennis Miller’s show; he went off on the tea party people saying that if they refused to support the GOP candidate, taking their numbers and allowing Obama to win in 2012, they would have lost him.

    I think people are starting to get it; that these tea party people are not those who in the beginning came together because of Obamacare.

    They are, simply, Losertarians who for most of Bush’s time pretended to be the base of the GOP–and now are claiming to be the tea party.

    We need them to actually go–be the party they can be loyal to and have candidates they can support.

    We won’t miss their 1.7% but they will miss the GOP they’ve managed to con. They’ll lose the facade of respectability and we’ll lose a bunch of whiners who want to destroy the only viable party that reasonable.

1 Trackback or Pingback


WordPress SEO fine-tune by Meta SEO Pack from Poradnik Webmastera